Explore Mahua Moitra strong response post-expulsion, she challenges the authority of the Ethics panel.
Mahua Moitra accuses the government of silencing dissent, and declares it as a Black chapter in Indian parliamentary history.
New Delhi, 08 December(City Times):Mahua Moitra Expulsion: In a shocking turn of events on Friday, Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra faced expulsion from the Lok Sabha over charges of ‘unethical conduct.’ The expulsion was a direct outcome of an Ethics Committee report linked to the cash-for-query controversy, sparking a heated debate within the parliamentary walls.
Mahua Moitra Expulsion Decision
The Lok Sabha witnessed a dramatic development as the Ethics Committee’s report was tabled, accusing Moitra of unethical behavior. In a swift motion, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pralhad Joshi moved for her expulsion, leading to a voice vote that sealed her fate. The opposition, however, contested the legitimacy of the decision, giving rise to a walkout and allegations of ‘vendetta politics.’
Mahua Moitra staunchly opposed her expulsion, challenging the Ethics panel’s authority to take such punitive action. She criticized the government, alleging an attempt to silence her and viewing the incident as the onset of the opposition’s decline. Moitra also questioned the ethics panel’s report, denouncing it for breaching established norms.
The Parliamentary Drama Unfolds on Mahua Moitra Expulsion
As the debate unfolded, Moitra was denied an opportunity to speak, adding fuel to the already intense situation. The motion for expulsion was swiftly adopted, leaving opposition MPs dissatisfied and prompting a walkout. Congress leader Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury characterized the episode as a ‘dark day’ in the House.
Expressing discontent, several opposition lawmakers accused the government of pursuing ‘vendetta politics’ and criticized the inadequacy of the report. BSP MP Danish Ali highlighted the report’s shortcomings, emphasizing the incomplete deposition process.
The expulsion of Mahua Moitra has injected fresh tension into the political arena, triggering debates on procedural fairness and transparency in such decisions. The ongoing controversy continues to shape the narrative, leaving the political landscape in a state of flux.