Udhayanidhi Challenged Sanatana Dharma And boldly declared that Sanatana Dharma is fundamentally opposed to the principles of social justice and should be eradicated
Chennai, 02 September (City Times): Udhayanidhi Challenged Sanatana Dharma: Udhayanidhi Stalin, Sports and Youth Affairs minister of Tamil Nadu and the son of Chief Minister MK Stalin, has ignited a fierce controversy with his recent comments regarding Sanatana Dharma, one of India’s ancient philosophies.
In his statement, he boldly declared that Sanatana Dharma is fundamentally opposed to the principles of social justice and should be “eradicated.” Drawing parallels with diseases like dengue and malaria, his remarks have sent shockwaves across the nation, particularly among supporters of this traditional belief system.
Social Media Backlash
Udhayanidhi comments didn’t go unnoticed, and the backlash on social media was swift and intense. Many individuals and political figures took to various platforms, demanding legal action against the Tamil Nadu minister.
Amit Malviya alleged that Stalin’s words amounted to a call for the genocide of those adhering to Sanatana Dharma.BJP leader Amit Malviya criticized Udhayanidhi Stalin for his recent remarks. Malviya stated that Udhayanidhi had equated Sanatana Dharma with diseases like malaria and dengue and called for its eradication rather than opposition. Malviya expressed concerns that Udhayanidhi’s statements implied advocating for the genocide of the 80% population in India who follow Sanatan Dharma.
He also raised questions about whether such views were part of the agreements made during the recent Opposition meeting in Mumbai, where DMK is a prominent member and a long-standing ally of the Congress.
BJP Pesident K Annamalai also Strongly Reacted
BJP President K Annamalai also Strongly Reacted on This issue Annamalai, the state President of the BJP, criticized the DMK Party and said Gopalapuram Family is having one sole ambition: amassing wealth exceeding the entire State GDP. He directed pointed comments towards Udhayanidhi Stalin, suggesting that he, his father, and their ideology may have been influenced by Christian missionaries. Annamalai accused these missionaries of seeking to cultivate individuals like Udhayanidhi to promote what he views as their harmful beliefs. He urged Udhayanidhi to use his platform for more constructive purposes within Tamil Nadu, a state deeply rooted in spiritualism, instead of venting his frustrations.
Stalin’s Defense and Counterargument
Udhayanidhi Stalin, defended his recent statements by clarifying that he did not call for the genocide of people following Sanatan Dharma. He emphasized that his critique was directed at the principle of Sanatan Dharma, which he believes divides people based on caste and religion.
Udhayanidhi maintained his stance, stating that he spoke on behalf of the oppressed and marginalized individuals who suffer due to the effects of Sanatan Dharma. He expressed his readiness to present extensive writings from Periyar and Ambedkar, who conducted in-depth research on Sanatan Dharma’s negative impact on society.
Udhayanidhi Strongly defended his views to the spread of diseases like COVID-19, Dengue, and Malaria, attributing social evils to Sanatan Dharma. He concluded by stating his preparedness to face challenges in a court of law or in the court of public opinion and urged against the spread of false information.
In response to the mounting criticism, Udhayanidhi Stalin defended his stance. He sought to clarify that his intention was not to advocate for the genocide of Sanatana Dharma followers but rather to highlight what he perceives as the philosophy’s role in perpetuating social inequalities based on caste and religion.
According to Udaynidhi Stalin, eradicating Sanatana Dharma is a necessary step in the pursuit of human equality and social justice. He also expressed his willingness to provide extensive writings from prominent leaders like Periyar and Ambedkar, who conducted thorough research on the negative impact of Sanatana Dharma on society. Stalin declared his readiness to face any challenges, whether in a court of law or the court of public opinion.
The controversy ignited by Udhayanidhi Stalin’s comments underscores the ongoing debate regarding the place of ancient philosophies like Sanatana Dharma in contemporary Indian society, especially concerning issues of social justice and equality. This incident serves as a reminder of the complex and deeply rooted discussions that continue to shape the nation’s cultural and political landscape.