Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee Faces Major Setback as SC Refuses Stay (Gyanvapi Complex)
Preservation of Gyanvapi Mosque Complex Emphasized in Supreme Court’s Ruling
New Delhi, 04 August (City Times) : (Gyanvapi Complex) In a significant development, the Supreme Court dealt a blow to the Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee by refusing to stay the Allahabad High Court’s directive for the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) to conduct a survey of the Gyanvapi mosque complex in Varanasi.
A three-judge bench, led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dr. Dhananjaya Yeshwant Chandrachud, made it clear that the survey must be conducted using non-invasive methods, ensuring no excavation or damage occurs to the mosque’s walls or structure.
The Supreme Court upheld the Allahabad High Court’s order, emphasizing the ASI’s role in preserving historical monuments without causing any harm to their integrity.
The Court granted all parties the right to file objections to the ASI survey and took note of Solicitor General Tushar Mehta’s assurance that no damage would occur to even a single brick of the mosque.
Representing the Masjid Committee, senior lawyer Huzefa Ahmadi raised concerns about frivolous claims for ASI surveys, but the CJI responded that what may seem frivolous to one party could be a matter of faith to others. The Court asserted its commitment to safeguarding the interests of all parties and ensured no harm would be done to the mosque premises.
The Supreme Court’s ruling came in response to the Masjid Committee’s appeal challenging the Allahabad High Court’s order directing the ASI to conduct a survey of the Gyanvapi mosque complex.
On Thursday, the Allahabad HC had issued the order for the ASI survey of the Gyanvapi mosque complex in Varanasi. The recent developments mark a significant legal and cultural milestone in the ongoing case.
In conclusion, the Supreme Court’s refusal to stay the ASI survey and its emphasis on non-invasive methods demonstrate a commitment to preserving the Gyanvapi mosque complxx while considering all parties’ interests. The ruling marks a significant step in the ongoing legal process and highlights the importance of respecting the site’s cultural and religious significance.